[БОДЛОГЫН СУДАЛГАА, ШИНЖИЛГЭЭ] Боть-6 146 rescission enters into force on the day of publication if the Court does not set a deadline, which may not exceed six months or, if legal dispositions are necessary, a year, for the rescission. (6) If an ordinance has been rescinded on the score of illegality or if the Constitutional Court has pursuant to Paragraph (4) pronounced an ordinance to be contrary to law, all courts and administrative authorities are bound by the Court's decision. The ordinance shall, however, continue to apply to the circumstances effected before the rescission, the case in point excepted, unless the Court in its rescissory judgment decides otherwise. If the Court has in its rescissory judgment set a deadline pursuant to Paragraph (5), the ordinance shall apply to all the circumstances effected, the case in point excepted, till the expiry of this deadline. Article 139a [Legal Norms] The Constitutional Court pronounces on application by a court whether in the re-publication of a legal norm the limits of the authority conferred were transcended; ex officio, in so far as the re-publication of the legal norm constitutes the prerequisite to a judgment by the Court itself; also on application by a State Government, in the case of legal norms re-published by the Federation. Likewise on application by the Federal Government in the case of legal norms republished by a State. It pronounces furthermore whether in the re-publication of a legal norm the limits of the authority conferred were transcended when an application alleges direct infringement of personal rights in so far as the republished legal norm has become operative against the applicant without the delivery of a judicial decision or the issue of a ruling. Article 59 (2), (3) and (5) as well as Article 139 (2) to (6) apply analogously. Article 140 [Laws] (1) The Constitutional Court pronounces on application by the Administrative Court, the Supreme Court, or a competent appellate court whether a Federal or State law is unconstitutional, but ex officio in so far as the Court would have to apply such a law in a pending suit. It pronounces also on application by the Federal Government whether State laws are unconstitutional and likewise on application by a State Government or by one third of the House of Representatives' members whether Federal laws are unconstitutional. A State constitutional law can provide that such a right of application as regards the unconstitutionality of State laws lies with one third of the State Parliament's members. The Court also pronounces whether laws are unconstitutional when an application alleges direct infringement of personal rights through such unconstitutionality in so far as the law has become operative for the applicant without the delivery of a judicial decision or the issue of a ruling. Article 89 (3) applies analogously to such applications. (2) If the litigant in a suit lodged with the Constitutional Court, entailing application of a law by the Court receives satisfaction, the proceedings initiated to examine the law's constitutionality shall nevertheless continue. (3) The Constitutional Court may rescind a law as unconstitutional only to the extent that its rescission was expressly submitted or the Court would have to apply the law in the suit pending with it. If, however, the Court concludes that the whole law was enacted by a legislative authority unqualified in accordance with the allocation of competence or published in an unconstitutional manner, it shall rescind the whole law as unconstitutional. This does not apply if rescission of the whole law manifestly runs contrary to the legitimate interests of the litigant who has filed an application pursuant to the last sentence in Paragraph (1) or whose suit has been the occasion for the initiation of ex officio examination proceedings into the law. (4) If the law has, at the time of the Constitutional Court's delivery of its judgment, already been repealed and the proceedings were initiated ex officio or the application filed by a court or an applicant alleging direct infringement of personal rights through the law's unconstitutionality, the Court must pronounce whether the law was unconstitutional. Paragraph (3) applies analogously. (5) The judgment by the Constitutional Court which rescinds a law as unconstitutional imposes on the Federal Chancellor or the competent State-Governor the obligation to publish the rescission without delay. This applies analogously in the case of a pronouncement pursuant to Paragraph (4). The rescission enters into force on the day of publication if the Court does not set a deadline for the rescission. This deadline may not exceed one year. (6) If a law is rescinded as unconstitutional by a judgment of the Constitutional Court, the legal provisions rescinded by the law which the Court has pronounced unconstitutional become effective again, unless the judgment pronounces otherwise, on the day of entry into force of the rescission. The publication on the rescission of the law shall also announce whether and which legal provisions again enter into force. (7) If a law has been rescinded on the score of unconstitutionality or if the Constitutional Court has, pursuant to Paragraph (4), pronounced a law unconstitutional, all courts and administrative authorities are
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjE1NzIw